Veltrix Flow Systems
Manufacturing operations review FY2026

Measuring the factory
behind every product

1.84 million finished units left the floor in FY2026, across industrial pumps, valve assemblies, fluid-control modules, and engineered flow components. This is the year read the way the factory reads it: output, losses, and the hours recovered in between.

1.84M
Units produced
84.7%
Overall equipment effectiveness
96.2%
First-pass yield
47 min
Average changeover
Production plan

The plan said 1.92M. The factory delivered 1.84M.

Planned vs actual units000s per quarter
450 422 465 451 480 455 525 512 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Operational reading

The 96% attainment gap was not one big disruption.

Q1 took supplier-related interruptions. Q3 was held back by machining constraints and a heavier-than-planned product mix.

Q4 delivered the strongest quarter of the year, after bottleneck capacity was rebalanced and maintenance windows moved off peak production.

Time losses

Where production time disappears

A scheduled hour does not automatically become a productive hour. Equipment failure is the largest single loss, but more than half of lost time comes from non-failure causes: improving output takes coordination across maintenance, materials, quality, scheduling, and production, not simply faster machines.

Equipment failure
18,400 hrs · 28%
Changeovers
14,700 hrs · 22%
Material waiting
10,900 hrs · 17%
Quality holds
8,100 hrs · 12%
Micro-stops
7,400 hrs · 11%
Labor gaps
4,200 hrs · 6%
Other
2,600 hrs · 4%
Changeovers
47 min average time between products, down 14% year over year. The best line changes over in 31 minutes; the slowest averages 68. Changeovers still consume 7.4% of scheduled production time.

The fix is external setup: prepare tooling, materials, and tests while the previous run is still active, and stop the machine only for what truly requires it.

Best line
31 min
Factory average
47 min
Highest line average
68 min
Quality

Making it right once

Producing a unit creates no useful output if it immediately needs rework, so Veltrix treats first-pass yield as a core KPI. FY2026 reached 96.2% on tighter process controls and earlier detection of dimensional variation in machining: rework hours fell 18%, repeat defects fell 22%, and final acceptance closed the year at 98.1%.

A unit can eventually pass inspection while still consuming labor, machine time, and capacity through rework. First-pass and final quality are different numbers on purpose.

98.1%
Final acceptance rate
-18%
Rework hours, YoY
-22%
Repeat defects, YoY
2.4%
Units requiring rework
The customer's copy of quality
0.74% customer defect rate, down 19% year over year. Of 1,420 warranty claims, 96.8% were investigated within 5 days and 82% of corrective actions closed within 30.

The costliest defect is the one the customer finds. Quality is judged by whether corrective action keeps the same failure mode from reaching another customer; repeat customer defects fell 14%.

Scrap has a pattern
Machining dimension errors
27%
Material defects
21%
Assembly damage
16%
Surface defects
13%
Welding
10%
Setup loss
8%

Overall scrap 2.9%, down 0.6 pts YoY. Next program: machining capability and incoming-material quality, together almost half the total.

Equipment

Available does not mean productive

A machine can be technically available while producing nothing: waiting for material, running below standard speed, sitting in setup, or idle with no order ready. Availability reached 94.6%; productive utilization averaged 82.8%. The 11.8 points between them are recoverable capacity.

82.8% Productive utilization
6.1% Lost to material waiting
3.4% Lost to scheduling gaps
2.3% Other idle time
5.4% Not available: downtime and maintenance
Preventive compliance ↑quarterly
88.291.6 94.196.3 Q1Q2 Q3Q4
Unplanned downtime ↓quarterly
5.44.9 4.43.7 Q1Q2 Q3Q4

Emergency work orders: 418 → 376 → 321 → 268 across the four quarters.

The constraint does not stay in one place

Bottlenecks shift with product mix, so operations teams monitor queue accumulation and utilization by stage and follow the actual constraint, not the busiest-looking department.

Process stageUtilizationAvg. queueStatus
Machining
91%6.8 hrsHigh
Testing
89%5.9 hrsHigh
Assembly
84%3.7 hrsMonitor
Component prep
76%2.1 hrsNormal
Painting / finishing
71%1.8 hrsNormal
Final packing
68%1.2 hrsNormal
Labor

Paid hours vs. productive hours

Operators can be present yet lose time waiting for materials, instructions, maintenance support, quality approval, or upstream processes. Of every paid production hour, 77.7% ends up directly productive; units per labor hour still rose 5.6% while overtime fell 8.4%.

100% -6.0 -6.8 -4.1 -3.2 -2.2 77.7% PAID HOURS BREAKS / TRAINING MATERIAL WAITING EQUIPMENT WAITING CHANGEOVER SUPPORT QUALITY HOLDS PRODUCTIVE HOURS

Loss split estimated from time-study sampling

The biggest productivity lever is reducing waiting, not asking teams to work faster during hours that are already productive.

Energy

How much energy does one unit require?

Electricity and gas are measured per equivalent unit produced, not only as total plant consumption. Intensity fell 10.2% from Q1 to Q4 while output rose from 420K to 512K units per quarter: higher volume did not require proportionally more energy.

Next: machining, compressed-air systems, and equipment left running through extended idle periods.

kWh per equivalent unit↓ 10.2%
19.618.7 18.117.6 Q1 · 420KQ2 · 448K Q3 · 456KQ4 · 512K
Plants

Three plants, three profiles

Riverside
Benchmark
742K
87.6%
97.1%
3.5%
2.2%
95.7%
39 min
Hawthorne
618K
83.9%
95.8%
4.7%
3.0%
93.4%
48 min
Meridian
Focus
480K
81.4%
95.4%
5.9%
3.8%
91.8%
59 min

Riverside sets the internal benchmark; Meridian's gap concentrates in downtime, scrap, and changeover duration, not one isolated issue. Process-level benchmarking will move specific practices between plants rather than one identical program.

FY2027 agenda

Recover capacity before adding capacity

The factory still holds recoverable capacity in downtime, changeovers, rework, waiting, schedule disruption, and quality losses. Before committing capital to new equipment, Veltrix will first reclaim the production time it already pays for.

OEE84.7%87.0%
First-pass yield96.2%97.2%
Unplanned downtime4.6%<3.5%
Average changeover47 min<40 min
Scrap rate2.9%<2.3%
Schedule attainment93.8%96.0%
Productive labor utilization77.7%81.0%
Also on the FY2027 agenda

Schedule stability. 14% of orders were resequenced within 48 hours of planned start in FY2026. The objective is not eliminating change, but protecting the factory from avoidable volatility.

Constraint-led capacity. Investment follows measured queues and utilization, not the busiest-looking department.

Practice transfer. Riverside's changeover and maintenance practices move to Hawthorne and Meridian at process level.

Closing

The factory has more capacity than its output shows

  • Reducing waiting creates hours.
  • Reducing changeovers creates hours.
  • Preventing failures creates hours.
  • Eliminating rework creates hours.

Operational excellence turns those recovered hours into reliable output. The next stage converts more scheduled resources into first-pass, customer-ready production; the most valuable additional line may be the capacity hidden inside the existing factory.

1.84M
Units
84.7%
OEE
96.2%
FPY
93.8%
Schedule
4.6%
Downtime
2.9%
Scrap
47 min
Changeover
77.7%
Labor util.
Veltrix Flow Systems FY2026 operations review